Matt Miller is a senior media studies major.
As an individual that bears marginalized identities, I feel especially impacted by and interested in issues of diversity and social justice. This inclination is, in part, what made me choose USF in my college search as a prospective student. USF’s mission statement lists “the diversity of perspectives, experiences and traditions” as one of its core educational values. Coming here, I expected to find comfort in the diversity the institution promised I would find.
After three years of being a student at the university, however, I’ve come to feel underwhelmed by the representation of diverse perspectives on-campus.
In my Media Studies courses, I often take a moment to scan the classroom and observe my peers. My eyes are met with classes filled with white privileged students, and as each semester draws on, it becomes clear that issues of diversity aren’t a prime focus for many of my fellow Media Studies majors.
To me, it seems the majority of student media on-campus is produced by the privileged, about the privileged, and for the privileged.
Student-produced content created by classmates or by student media outlets like USFtv or the Foghorn will often miss the mark when it comes to representing the diverse perspectives the university claims are a core value to this institution. When I attend student film showings, I’m disappointed by the overrepresentation of privileged narratives and the underrepresentation or complete misrepresentation of marginalized narratives. I can only sit through so many straight, cisgendered white narratives before I start to wonder why so many perspectives are erased semester after semester.
In recent times, it feels as though USFtv’s cultural segment has missed a wealth of opportunities to cover important cultural issues like San Francisco’s growing gentrification problem. Instead of covering issues that matter, the cultural segment has most recently focused on topics like Pug Sunday at Alta Plaza Park and the best places to find coffee in the city. While I enjoy cute dog videos as much as the next person, I’d rather see a cultural segment that covers issues of greater value.
The Foghorn’s satirical April Fools issue offended some people of subordinated identities in the USF community last semester. The misrepresentation of marginalized identities in that issue, intentional or not, sparked a crucial conversation about the way marginalized identities fit into campus media.
Do students producing media at USF bear a responsibility to be more conscious of marginalized identities? Are our Media Studies professors doing enough to meet the core educational values in the university’s mission statement?
While it would be highly unrealistic to expect every student involved in producing media on-campus to focus their energies solely on issues of diversity and social justice, I do think there is serious room to improve when it comes to giving the spotlight to these topics.
Going into my final year at USF, I hope to see a shift in the kind of content my peers create. Diverse perspectives already exist amongst the USF community—right now, I think it’s a matter of continuing the existing conversation about what issues deserve more air time, how to properly represent marginalized identities, and in what ways community leaders like professors can do more to promote a focus on these topics.
I hope I can leave this university feeling more satisfied with the way student media includes diverse perspectives. As things stand right now, however, there’s still much to be desired.
Bill oriely debunked white privilege as a myth this past week on his tv show. Asians make more in the united states now. It’s Asian privilege going forward. And there is nothing wrong with that. Their cultural focuses on hard work, good grades, and staying together as a family. Others who want their privilege are more likely to get the same results if they do practice those same values.
Diversity at a $50 a year private college. Huh. Don’t fool yourself. Diversity in thought yes. But until this author chooses to pay for someone else different from him to join him at USF he better get use to being around the privileged be they white or as a in or something else.
The author seems to harbor racial antipathy toward white people.
“In my Media Studies courses, I often take a moment to scan the classroom and observe my peers. My eyes are met with classes filled with white privileged students, and as each semester draws on, it becomes clear that issues of diversity aren’t a prime focus for many of my fellow Media Studies majors.”
What exactly does being white have to do with anything? Is he not aware that white people do not choose to be white? Does he think that white people should be removed from campus because they don’t conform to his ideal of diversity? What is wrong in 21st century America when our most educated youth are evaluating people primarily based on their race? Isn’t a person’s character and intelligence more important than the color of their skin?
The issue of privilege is equally disturbing. It leaves me to wonder by what objective measure the author determined that his classmates are privileged, and what exactly he might mean by branding them so. For my own part I aware of at least one white female USF student pursuing her senior year of undergraduate studies as a Media Studies major who has had to work her way through college, often times holding two jobs, and who has yet managed to make the Dean’s list on multiple occasions. I can assure the author she doesn’t come from privilege, but she knows how to size up a racist.
Didn’t you defend the Foghorn’s April Fools issue quite vehemently when it came out? Seems to me like you’re trying to distance yourself from the Foghorn now that it’s fashionable, but you certainly weren’t there crying about diversity when actual POCs and LGBT readers were offended. Stop acting like you care for the sake of another byline