Comments on: Father Fitzgerald Responds to Interview Reactions

By: Erik

Erik — Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:22:39 +0000

In all seriousness Justin, unfortunately the “response” you are commenting on probably was not written by Paul Fitzgerald. It was probably written by Peter Novak. If you compare the language in the original interview with the grammar and syntax of the
“response”, hard to see it being the same person. What do others think?

By: Erik

Erik — Sun, 12 Apr 2015 04:53:52 +0000

USF student associations need to come together and have Fitzgerald removed from the Presidency. His presence will surely weaken the stature of any degree issued by the university while he is in office and if he had any integrity, he would resign after making his views on harassment public in “Foghorn”. The Trustees failed by appointing him. Has anyone ever seen a syllabus P. Fitzgerald is responsible for? Does anyone know exactly what his actions were when he was in Africa and how many people he desecrated? He was involved in a women’s rights controversy at Fordham yet that did not seem to hinder his USF appointment. Curiously, Santa Clara did not want him back after his Fordham experience. A very curious situation.

By: Justin

Justin — Thu, 09 Apr 2015 20:20:36 +0000

This is not a proper response to the people’s reaction to your horrible statements. Try harder. This is extremely embarrassing.

By: Lucas

Lucas — Tue, 07 Apr 2015 22:44:13 +0000

“Our goal is zero incidents of sexual violence toward women at USF.” This isn’t a satisfactory response. Biological women are not the only people who survive sexual assault. I hope other alumni see these articles and collectively call for a much more thorough response from USF’s leadership about exactly which kinds of people they endorse including in sexual assault policies.